Oil at $100? Why you should always have energy stocks in your 401(k).

Here is the article body based on the provided headline and summary.

---

The recent divergence between energy equities and the broader market serves as a potent reminder of the value of sector diversification. While technology and consumer discretionary names have often driven index performance, energy and resource stocks have demonstrated a tendency to move counter to that trend. This "zig while the market zags" behavior is not merely a short-term anomaly; it reflects a fundamental difference in what drives these sectors. Energy valuations are heavily influenced by physical supply-and-demand dynamics, geopolitical events, and inventory levels, rather than purely by interest rate expectations or consumer sentiment.

For long-term investors, this historical low correlation is the core argument for maintaining a strategic allocation to the sector within a retirement portfolio. When growth stocks face headwinds from economic slowdowns or rising input costs, energy companies often benefit from the same inflationary pressures that hurt other sectors. Their cash flows are directly tied to commodity prices, which can act as a natural hedge against a decline in the purchasing power of your other assets. The current market environment, where volatility has become a constant companion, highlights why a static allocation to this cyclical group is a structural feature of prudent portfolio construction, not a speculative bet on a specific price target.